Skip to content

Commit 95ea6c2

Browse files
authored
Update EventSelection.md
1 parent 278e4e1 commit 95ea6c2

1 file changed

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

docs/analysis-tools/EventSelection.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -289,14 +289,14 @@ Additional effect takes place at the **beginning of the next TF**, where the rec
289289
```
290290
- Note that this cut also helps to remove collisions at the ROF borders in the MFT detector (where the same chips as in the ITS are used, and the MFT ROFs are time-aligned with the ITS ROFs).
291291
292-
The effect on <nITSclusters> per track in Data and MC is shown in the following example figure:
292+
The effect on ```<nITSclusters>``` per track in Data and MC is shown in the following example figure:
293293
294294
<div align="center">
295-
<img src="ROF_border_pp_data_vs_MC.png" width="60%">
295+
<img src="ROF_border_pp_data_vs_MC.png" width="80%">
296296
</div>
297297
298298
The "position" of the dip varies slightly in different runs, but it's always in the BC range -20...+10 wrt nominal ROF border.
299-
In MC, the effect is simulated via a chip response function, and the magnitude is visibly underestimated (in some PWGs, there was a recommendation to bypass the ```kNoITSROFrameBorder``` selection to keep more statistics for MC).
299+
In MC, the effect is simulated via a chip response function, and the magnitude is visibly underestimated (in some PWGs, there was a recommendation to bypass the ```kNoITSROFrameBorder``` selection to keep more events in MC for analysis).
300300
301301
302302
More details on the TF and ROF border effects and cuts can be found e.g. in slides 2-17 of [presentation (November 2024)](https://indico.cern.ch/event/1453901/timetable/#6-event-selection-in-run3).

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)