[Suggestion] Better Benchmarks

[rafaell-lycan]

Hey @cristianbote 👋

First of all, thanks for this amazing library. I just started using it as a Styled Components alternative and it feels faster while keeping a similar API.

About the benchmarks, I noticed the comparison doesn't use the latest styled-components@v6, so updating it might be more accurate. Also, I'd strongly suggest adding other competitors like linaria, fela and vanilla-extract.

Anywho, great job with the library's direction, and I'd love to see where it goes in the future!

[cristianbote]

heya @rafaell-lycan! thanks for using goober 🙏

Yeah, it's been a minute since those benchmarks took place. So I think I'll look into it and see where this goes. Great suggestion!

[cristianbote]

@getaidev-user can you look into this?

[getaidev-user]

Heya @cristianbote, I'd be happy to help—please assign me to this issue and I'll get started right away.

Proposed plan: update the benchmarks to use styled-components@v6, add tests for linaria, fela, and vanilla-extract, make the harness consistent across libs (same inputs, warmups, and metrics), run CI/benchmarks, and open a PR with results and updated docs. Do you have any specific metrics or environments you want prioritized (e.g., cold render time, repeated render time, bundle size, SSR)?