Skip to content

new m2m introspection code not necessarily the perfect solution #79

@SysPete

Description

@SysPete

My biggest issue is using the before table modifier in ::ResultSourceProxy::Table to add the result class m2m metadata accessor: I'm sure there is a better place to add that. Otherwise all is fine though perhaps it would be useful to add even more metadata or maybe change the hash keys?
@gregapompe / @racke: Comments?
(see #36 for details of old m2m issue)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions