Skip to content

Commit 1dcaa92

Browse files
fix(deps): bump @salesforce/packaging from 4.11.0 to 4.12.0
Bumps [@salesforce/packaging](https://github.com/forcedotcom/packaging) from 4.11.0 to 4.12.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/forcedotcom/packaging/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/forcedotcom/packaging/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](forcedotcom/packaging@4.11.0...4.12.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@salesforce/packaging" dependency-version: 4.12.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
1 parent e8fa81b commit 1dcaa92

2 files changed

Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions

File tree

package.json

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
"@oclif/core": "^4",
99
"@salesforce/core": "^8.19.1",
1010
"@salesforce/kit": "^3.2.3",
11-
"@salesforce/packaging": "^4.11.0",
11+
"@salesforce/packaging": "^4.12.0",
1212
"@salesforce/sf-plugins-core": "^12.2.4",
1313
"chalk": "^5.5.0"
1414
},

yarn.lock

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1546,10 +1546,10 @@
15461546
dependencies:
15471547
"@salesforce/ts-types" "^2.0.12"
15481548

1549-
"@salesforce/packaging@^4.11.0":
1550-
version "4.11.0"
1551-
resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@salesforce/packaging/-/packaging-4.11.0.tgz#f94a118fa033f28618befe89df7a96cff96acd38"
1552-
integrity sha512-wloyxwM0CqdmrM4W/F4rjjVrq82Vyc7/J2XEG7FgzOngYgJVt3w7zcjuUXQGkTfqSJ7AubnzzayyFHZ79UZpkg==
1549+
"@salesforce/packaging@^4.12.0":
1550+
version "4.12.0"
1551+
resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@salesforce/packaging/-/packaging-4.12.0.tgz#af981410c2d629cd4bd19bdf00236edce4317acd"
1552+
integrity sha512-jY/zerOoXE3QJbdcVfsVc9aDmxKPzZBibHGYmia6knISvqE2/WXAv8FaubdoHuT8i2NP7+XqpryTkCyY/ffqtA==
15531553
dependencies:
15541554
"@jsforce/jsforce-node" "^3.6.5"
15551555
"@salesforce/core" "^8.18.5"

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)