Bump ananas

[tomusdrw]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1cf96a7f-ce34-4ab6-b2b1-f69ae8deb532

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd0590d and 42ea17a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• bin/lib/package.json

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• bin/lib/package.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the dependency @fluffylabs/anan-as to ^1.3.0 across relevant packages for improved compatibility and stability.

Walkthrough

Updated the dependency specification for @fluffylabs/anan-as from ^1.1.5 to ^1.3.0 in two package manifest files: packages/core/pvm-interpreter-ananas/package.json and bin/lib/package.json. No other fields, scripts, exports, or public declarations were changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Bump anan-as to the newest version #872: Previously updated the same @fluffylabs/anan-as dependency (related version bump history).

Suggested reviewers

• skoszuta
• DrEverr

Poem

I hopped through package.json glades,
nudged a version, fixed the shades,
from 1.1.5 to 1.3.0 I sped,
carrots and CI nod in bed 🥕✨
— a rabbit's small deploy-time tread

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess relevance to the changeset.	Add a description explaining the reason for the dependency bump and any compatibility or feature changes introduced.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Bump ananas' directly describes the main change: updating the @fluffylabs/anan-as dependency version.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch td-ananas

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@packages/core/pvm-interpreter-ananas/package.json`:
- Line 7: The `@fluffylabs/anan-as` dependency has mismatched versions across
package.json files; update every occurrence of the dependency
"@fluffylabs/anan-as" to a single uniform version (e.g., set all to "^1.3.0") so
all package.json manifests use the same version; locate the dependency entries
in each package.json and replace the differing version strings (such as "^1.1.5"
and "^1.3.0") with the chosen canonical version.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7341bdb1-61c4-4ae1-b6d9-f0be8ce167a2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fbacf3 and cd0590d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/core/pvm-interpreter-ananas/package.json

[tomusdrw]

@fluffylabs-bot benchmark

[fluffylabs-bot]

✅ Benchmark workflow triggered successfully! 🎉
Requested by: @tomusdrw
PR number: #949
Target repository: FluffyLabs/typeberry-testing

🔗 Check the Actions tab for workflow progress.

[fluffylabs-bot]

Picofuzz Benchmark Results

fallback

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	3.71ms	3.66ms	≈ -0.05ms (-1.37%)
mean	5.45ms	5.55ms	≈ +0.10ms (+1.82%)
p90	7.67ms	7.72ms	≈ +0.05ms (+0.67%)
p99	10.93ms	9.97ms	≈ -0.96ms (-8.81%)

safrole

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	3.82ms	4.06ms	≈ +0.24ms (+6.20%)
mean	13.60ms	13.32ms	≈ -0.28ms (-2.06%)
p90	23.56ms	23.55ms	≈ -0.01ms (-0.06%)
p99	37.27ms	29.11ms	🟢 -8.16ms (-21.91%)

storage

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	4.89ms	4.41ms	≈ -0.47ms (-9.70%)
mean	30.95ms	28.69ms	≈ -2.26ms (-7.30%)
p90	64.71ms	57.47ms	🟢 -7.23ms (-11.18%)
p99	93.28ms	78.42ms	🟢 -14.87ms (-15.94%)

storage_light

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	6.02ms	6.44ms	≈ +0.42ms (+6.98%)
mean	20.37ms	19.64ms	≈ -0.74ms (-3.61%)
p90	33.30ms	30.70ms	≈ -2.60ms (-7.81%)
p99	42.38ms	39.50ms	≈ -2.89ms (-6.81%)

---

🤖 Automated benchmark

[github-actions]

View all

File	Benchmark	Ops
bytes/hex-from.ts[0]	parse hex using Number with NaN checking	64185.39 ±2.06%	86.17% slower
bytes/hex-from.ts[1]	parse hex from char codes	464037.46 ±0.39%	fastest ✅
bytes/hex-from.ts[2]	parse hex from string nibbles	268815.41 ±0.34%	42.07% slower
bytes/hex-to.ts[0]	number toString + padding	91762.24 ±0.5%	fastest ✅
bytes/hex-to.ts[1]	manual	7490.34 ±0.51%	91.84% slower
codec/bigint.compare.ts[0]	compare custom	96395526.93 ±4.81%	1.17% slower
codec/bigint.compare.ts[1]	compare bigint	97540910.34 ±4.55%	fastest ✅
codec/bigint.decode.ts[0]	decode custom	73493148.15 ±2.68%	21.03% slower
codec/bigint.decode.ts[1]	decode bigint	93069127.36 ±4.65%	fastest ✅
codec/decoding.ts[0]	manual decode	9315788.49 ±2.75%	86.37% slower
codec/decoding.ts[1]	int32array decode	66137501.87 ±3.09%	3.25% slower
codec/decoding.ts[2]	dataview decode	68362514.22 ±3.35%	fastest ✅
codec/encoding.ts[0]	manual encode	1087261.1 ±0.7%	13.11% slower
codec/encoding.ts[1]	int32array encode	1251278.97 ±0.39%	fastest ✅
codec/encoding.ts[2]	dataview encode	1232467.44 ±0.31%	1.5% slower
collections/map-set.ts[0]	2 gets + conditional set	71626.73 ±0.15%	fastest ✅
collections/map-set.ts[1]	1 get 1 set	47699.84 ±0.08%	33.4% slower
logger/index.ts[0]	console.log with string concat	5018937.02 ±44.45%	fastest ✅
logger/index.ts[1]	console.log with args	213858.22 ±123.5%	95.74% slower
math/add_one_overflow.ts[0]	add and take modulus	69580460.64 ±50.2%	27.42% slower
math/add_one_overflow.ts[1]	condition before calculation	95860686.15 ±4.37%	fastest ✅
math/count-bits-u32.ts[0]	standard method	45608219.23 ±2%	51.86% slower
math/count-bits-u32.ts[1]	magic	94733218.44 ±4.08%	fastest ✅
math/count-bits-u64.ts[0]	standard method	5021979.92 ±0.65%	81.27% slower
math/count-bits-u64.ts[1]	magic	26809008.09 ±1.21%	fastest ✅
math/mul_overflow.ts[0]	multiply and bring back to u32	100736602.52 ±5%	0.72% slower
math/mul_overflow.ts[1]	multiply and take modulus	101462403.65 ±4.48%	fastest ✅
math/switch.ts[0]	switch	98472308.25 ±4.82%	fastest ✅
math/switch.ts[1]	if	96565403.88 ±5.72%	1.94% slower
hash/index.ts[0]	hash with numeric representation	68.42 ±0.06%	31.21% slower
hash/index.ts[1]	hash with string representation	41.4 ±2.46%	58.38% slower
hash/index.ts[2]	hash with symbol representation	66.75 ±0.35%	32.89% slower
hash/index.ts[3]	hash with uint8 representation	76.44 ±0.17%	23.14% slower
hash/index.ts[4]	hash with packed representation	99.46 ±0.24%	fastest ✅
hash/index.ts[5]	hash with bigint representation	73.5 ±0.07%	26.1% slower
hash/index.ts[6]	hash with uint32 representation	93.25 ±0.22%	6.24% slower
bytes/bytes-to-number.ts[0]	Conversion with bitops	3701.56 ±6.06%	fastest ✅
bytes/bytes-to-number.ts[1]	Conversion without bitops	2769.7 ±4.68%	25.17% slower
bytes/compare.ts[0]	Comparing Uint32 bytes	11010.99 ±0.21%	fastest ✅
bytes/compare.ts[1]	Comparing raw bytes	10903.96 ±0.13%	0.97% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[0]	Get first element from Decoded	14863.14 ±0.68%	51.75% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[1]	Get first element from View	30801.53 ±0.43%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[2]	Get 50th element from Decoded	14687.85 ±0.54%	52.31% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[3]	Get 50th element from View	16005.58 ±0.31%	48.04% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[4]	Get last element from Decoded	14819.21 ±0.15%	51.89% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[5]	Get last element from View	10908.68 ±0.36%	64.58% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[0]	Get the first field from Decoded	197810.09 ±1.5%	4.33% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[1]	Get the first field from View	49054.64 ±0.37%	76.28% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[2]	Get the first field as view from View	48207.3 ±0.72%	76.68% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[3]	Get two fields from Decoded	202982.24 ±0.52%	1.83% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[4]	Get two fields from View	38508.61 ±0.4%	81.38% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[5]	Get two fields from materialized from View	76361.98 ±0.37%	63.07% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[6]	Get two fields as views from View	38512.82 ±0.39%	81.37% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[7]	Get only third field from Decoded	206764.43 ±0.35%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_object.ts[8]	Get only third field from View	47577.17 ±0.39%	76.99% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[9]	Get only third field as view from View	47507.64 ±0.34%	77.02% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[0]	Map	137705.41 ±0.18%	fastest ✅
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[1]	Map-array	47227.38 ±0.12%	65.7% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[2]	Array	54944.95 ±0.2%	60.1% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[3]	SortedArray	84043.85 ±0.17%	38.97% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	2600.72 ±0.41%	0.51% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	2613.97 ±0.42%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	2613.65 ±0.35%	0.01% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	2612.8 ±0.4%	0.04% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	2601.08 ±0.43%	0.49% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	2607.98 ±0.37%	0.23% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	2980.65 ±0.29%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	2925.72 ±0.35%	1.84% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	2913.47 ±0.34%	2.25% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	2903.57 ±0.3%	2.59% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	2928.77 ±0.34%	1.74% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	2830.86 ±1.19%	5.03% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	2376.6 ±0.31%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	2366.15 ±0.29%	0.44% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	2357.64 ±0.32%	0.8% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	2331.05 ±0.39%	1.92% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	2264.16 ±2.79%	4.73% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	2330.33 ±0.42%	1.95% slower
hash/blake2b.ts[0]	our hasher	1.08 ±0.18%	fastest ✅
hash/blake2b.ts[1]	blake2b js	0.03 ±0.35%	97.22% slower
crypto/ed25519.ts[0]	native crypto	5.714 ±0.93%	fastest ✅
crypto/ed25519.ts[1]	wasm lib	2.285 ±0.23%	60.01% slower
crypto/ed25519.ts[2]	wasm lib batch	2.281 ±0.22%	60.08% slower

Benchmarks summary: 83/83 OK ✅