Update node requirement in readme

[tomusdrw]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a9068207-901a-4cd6-be91-6296e6973909

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f43c4b and 7128418.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the Node.js version requirement in the project requirements from v22.9.0 to v24.0.0. This change clarifies the supported runtime and helps ensure the project is run with a more current Node.js release, reducing potential environment-related issues for contributors and deploys.

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the documented Node.js version example in README.md's "Requirements" section from v22.9.0 to v24.0.0. No other content or command snippets were changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Update readme #612: Earlier PR that bumped the README Node.js example to v22.9.0; this PR continues the version upgrade to v24.0.0.

Suggested reviewers

• mateuszsikora

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop — a tiny change I cheer,
From twenty-two to twenty-four we steer.
A README line, simple and bright,
I nibble digits through the night.
Version bumped — a joyful sight! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	No pull request description was provided by the author, which fails the basic requirement for meaningful documentation of changes.	Add a description explaining why the Node version requirement was updated and any relevant context or breaking changes.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: updating the Node version requirement in the README from v22.9.0 to v24.0.0.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch td-readme

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[tomusdrw]

@fluffylabs-bot benchmark

[fluffylabs-bot]

✅ Benchmark workflow triggered successfully! 🎉
Requested by: @tomusdrw
PR number: #950
Target repository: FluffyLabs/typeberry-testing

🔗 Check the Actions tab for workflow progress.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 42: Fix the spacing typo in the version string by replacing the incorrect
"v 24.0.0" token with the standard "v24.0.0" token; locate the occurrence of "v
24.0.0" in the README and remove the space so the version follows Node.js
format.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 310b6fba-e676-482b-a164-19ff3bcfb5ec

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fbacf3 and 7f43c4b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

[github-actions]

View all

File	Benchmark	Ops
bytes/hex-from.ts[0]	parse hex using Number with NaN checking	65397.4 ±0.78%	85.14% slower
bytes/hex-from.ts[1]	parse hex from char codes	440208.1 ±0.61%	fastest ✅
bytes/hex-from.ts[2]	parse hex from string nibbles	248280.25 ±1.47%	43.6% slower
bytes/hex-to.ts[0]	number toString + padding	88257.24 ±0.55%	fastest ✅
bytes/hex-to.ts[1]	manual	7287.85 ±0.86%	91.74% slower
codec/bigint.compare.ts[0]	compare custom	87009923.09 ±5.22%	fastest ✅
codec/bigint.compare.ts[1]	compare bigint	85028778.49 ±5.8%	2.28% slower
codec/bigint.decode.ts[0]	decode custom	60897729.73 ±4.38%	20.89% slower
codec/bigint.decode.ts[1]	decode bigint	76978113.43 ±6.57%	fastest ✅
codec/decoding.ts[0]	manual decode	9749451.49 ±1.16%	86.69% slower
codec/decoding.ts[1]	int32array decode	65964479.19 ±3.14%	9.93% slower
codec/decoding.ts[2]	dataview decode	73233645.95 ±3.85%	fastest ✅
codec/encoding.ts[0]	manual encode	1093804.29 ±0.51%	13.1% slower
codec/encoding.ts[1]	int32array encode	1258660.96 ±0.35%	fastest ✅
codec/encoding.ts[2]	dataview encode	1210557.21 ±0.96%	3.82% slower
collections/map-set.ts[0]	2 gets + conditional set	69106.07 ±0.24%	fastest ✅
collections/map-set.ts[1]	1 get 1 set	46608.72 ±0.57%	32.55% slower
logger/index.ts[0]	console.log with string concat	4810427.09 ±40.65%	fastest ✅
logger/index.ts[1]	console.log with args	1261252.45 ±83.55%	73.78% slower
math/add_one_overflow.ts[0]	add and take modulus	66825833.55 ±54.86%	30.7% slower
math/add_one_overflow.ts[1]	condition before calculation	96429403.9 ±5.88%	fastest ✅
math/count-bits-u32.ts[0]	standard method	34882787.91 ±1.91%	59.06% slower
math/count-bits-u32.ts[1]	magic	85196643.76 ±4.41%	fastest ✅
math/count-bits-u64.ts[0]	standard method	358917.24 ±0.56%	87.43% slower
math/count-bits-u64.ts[1]	magic	2854310 ±0.57%	fastest ✅
math/mul_overflow.ts[0]	multiply and bring back to u32	98283535.35 ±5.07%	fastest ✅
math/mul_overflow.ts[1]	multiply and take modulus	91438140.34 ±5.65%	6.96% slower
math/switch.ts[0]	switch	87091715.26 ±6.18%	fastest ✅
math/switch.ts[1]	if	81757127.48 ±6.6%	6.13% slower
hash/index.ts[0]	hash with numeric representation	57.13 ±2.5%	31.94% slower
hash/index.ts[1]	hash with string representation	35.02 ±3.6%	58.28% slower
hash/index.ts[2]	hash with symbol representation	57.67 ±2.55%	31.3% slower
hash/index.ts[3]	hash with uint8 representation	63.34 ±2.64%	24.54% slower
hash/index.ts[4]	hash with packed representation	83.94 ±2.4%	fastest ✅
hash/index.ts[5]	hash with bigint representation	65.07 ±2.3%	22.48% slower
hash/index.ts[6]	hash with uint32 representation	79.41 ±2.05%	5.4% slower
bytes/bytes-to-number.ts[0]	Conversion with bitops	2791.7 ±4.82%	fastest ✅
bytes/bytes-to-number.ts[1]	Conversion without bitops	2386.44 ±3.45%	14.52% slower
bytes/compare.ts[0]	Comparing Uint32 bytes	9386.24 ±2.77%	12.21% slower
bytes/compare.ts[1]	Comparing raw bytes	10691.83 ±0.52%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[0]	Get first element from Decoded	14680.2 ±0.62%	53.47% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[1]	Get first element from View	31552.23 ±0.54%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[2]	Get 50th element from Decoded	14788.2 ±0.61%	53.13% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[3]	Get 50th element from View	17063.41 ±0.71%	45.92% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[4]	Get last element from Decoded	14697.67 ±0.98%	53.42% slower
codec/view_vs_collection.ts[5]	Get last element from View	11694.77 ±1.18%	62.94% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[0]	Get the first field from Decoded	193291.45 ±0.88%	1.69% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[1]	Get the first field from View	48326.3 ±1.24%	75.42% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[2]	Get the first field as view from View	49913.89 ±0.65%	74.61% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[3]	Get two fields from Decoded	192410.37 ±1.26%	2.14% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[4]	Get two fields from View	39918.77 ±0.6%	79.7% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[5]	Get two fields from materialized from View	78456.99 ±0.69%	60.1% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[6]	Get two fields as views from View	39389.79 ±1.44%	79.97% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[7]	Get only third field from Decoded	196617.42 ±0.6%	fastest ✅
codec/view_vs_object.ts[8]	Get only third field from View	27044.78 ±85.34%	86.24% slower
codec/view_vs_object.ts[9]	Get only third field as view from View	46900.25 ±1.82%	76.15% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[0]	Map	121692.6 ±0.75%	fastest ✅
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[1]	Map-array	40780.04 ±2.9%	66.49% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[2]	Array	50636.36 ±1.68%	58.39% slower
collections/map_vs_sorted.ts[3]	SortedArray	66575 ±5.17%	45.29% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	2236.49 ±3.76%	3.87% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	2241.22 ±2.79%	3.67% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	2233.14 ±2.96%	4.01% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	2326.52 ±2.57%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	2277.96 ±2.37%	2.09% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_delete.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	2155.48 ±3.93%	7.35% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	2600.24 ±2.87%	16.62% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	3087.1 ±0.52%	1.01% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	3114 ±0.36%	0.15% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	3118.66 ±0.29%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	2961.2 ±2.09%	5.05% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_get.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	3064.65 ±0.76%	1.73% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[0]	StringHashDictionary	2220.39 ±0.77%	fastest ✅
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[1]	BlobDictionary(1)	2181.69 ±0.44%	1.74% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[2]	BlobDictionary(2)	2190.2 ±0.45%	1.36% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[3]	BlobDictionary(3)	2186.46 ±2.14%	1.53% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[4]	BlobDictionary(4)	2148.8 ±0.92%	3.22% slower
collections/hash-dict-vs-blob-dict_set.ts[5]	BlobDictionary(5)	2175.13 ±0.95%	2.04% slower
hash/blake2b.ts[0]	our hasher	0.87 ±3.59%	fastest ✅
hash/blake2b.ts[1]	blake2b js	0.03 ±5.19%	96.55% slower
crypto/ed25519.ts[0]	native crypto	5.61 ±1.17%	fastest ✅
crypto/ed25519.ts[1]	wasm lib	2.21 ±0.5%	60.61% slower
crypto/ed25519.ts[2]	wasm lib batch	2.2 ±0.79%	60.78% slower

Benchmarks summary: 83/83 OK ✅

[tomusdrw]

@fluffylabs-bot benchmark

[fluffylabs-bot]

Picofuzz Benchmark Results

fallback

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	3.71ms	3.72ms	≈ +0.01ms (+0.20%)
mean	5.45ms	5.58ms	≈ +0.13ms (+2.34%)
p90	7.67ms	7.72ms	≈ +0.05ms (+0.69%)
p99	10.93ms	10.71ms	≈ -0.22ms (-2.04%)

safrole

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	3.82ms	3.99ms	≈ +0.17ms (+4.52%)
mean	13.60ms	13.37ms	≈ -0.23ms (-1.69%)
p90	23.56ms	24.38ms	≈ +0.82ms (+3.47%)
p99	37.27ms	29.38ms	🟢 -7.89ms (-21.16%)

storage

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	4.89ms	4.29ms	🟢 -0.60ms (-12.32%)
mean	30.95ms	30.33ms	≈ -0.61ms (-1.98%)
p90	64.71ms	63.40ms	≈ -1.31ms (-2.02%)
p99	93.28ms	85.12ms	≈ -8.16ms (-8.75%)

storage_light

Metric	@typeberry/jam@0.5.11	Current	Difference
min	6.02ms	6.46ms	≈ +0.45ms (+7.40%)
mean	20.37ms	20.05ms	≈ -0.33ms (-1.61%)
p90	33.30ms	32.56ms	≈ -0.74ms (-2.23%)
p99	42.38ms	42.87ms	≈ +0.49ms (+1.15%)

---

🤖 Automated benchmark