fix #3604 Apply Transform node produces the wrong result on shapes with handles

[chintu4]

Issue #3604

The issue #3604 (Apply Transform node produces the wrong result on shapes with handles) i can see in the given video that

steps to reproduce issue.

1. Creating an ellipse shape using ellipse tool
2. Selected magic button (used to apply operations on end of the layer chain.) in the right side in Properties panel.
3. Choose apply transform
4. the ellipse shape in the Artboard gets distorted.

fix

At "node-graph\nodes\vector\src\vector_modification_nodes.rs" file , apply_transform is function which is used internally in node-graph system this function shows no visible change after addition of control handler code in apply transform function.
I have added a 3 line in apply_tranform function so that tranformation from geometry to vector happen both on Achor and handlers. currently only anchor points are being handled .

//control handler code 
for (handles, _start_index, _end_index) in vector.segment_domain.handles_and_points_mut() {
   		*handles = handles.apply_transformation(|p| transform.transform_point2(p));
   	}

the existing code only handles anchor points

//existing code
for (_, point) in vector.point_domain.positions_mut() {
    *point = transform.transform_point2(*point);
}

Verification

I have compiled and run this project on Linux machine. I have saw that my change doesn't show any visible change in Artboard transformation happens internally. Iam getting feedback message that "The "node has no parameter" i expect this is a expected behaviour.
Here is the verification video

export_fix.mp4

[timon-schelling]

!build

[github-actions]

📦 Build Complete for 15f04ee
https://2be21e86.graphite.pages.dev

[chintu4]

Is this pr got merged @timon-schelling

[Keavon]

Thank you for your attempt at this, hopefully you learned from the process. I ended up with a simpler, one-line solution that I just merged in #3687 (feel free to take a look) that is preferable to the three-line + extraneous comments proposed in this PR. Please feel free to continue submitting PRs and they will each be considered, although this one didn't end up being the approach we went with. Thanks again for taking the time and learning along the way.