Skip to content

Lambda versioning for provisioned concurrancy#309

Merged
Karthikeyannhs merged 3 commits intomainfrom
lambda_versioning_for_provisioned_concurrancy
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Lambda versioning for provisioned concurrancy#309
Karthikeyannhs merged 3 commits intomainfrom
lambda_versioning_for_provisioned_concurrancy

Conversation

@Karthikeyannhs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Context

Type of changes

  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • I have followed the code style of the project
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • This PR is a result of pair or mob programming

Sensitive Information Declaration

To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including PII (Personal Identifiable Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable Data) or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

  • I confirm that neither PII/PID nor sensitive data are included in this PR and the codebase changes.

eddalmond1
eddalmond1 previously approved these changes Aug 22, 2025
@Karthikeyannhs Karthikeyannhs merged commit e3be5de into main Aug 22, 2025
44 checks passed
eddalmond1 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
* lambda versioning for provisioned concurrency

* dlq is not for RequestResponse (sync)

* checkov skip for dlq
@Karthikeyannhs Karthikeyannhs deleted the lambda_versioning_for_provisioned_concurrancy branch September 4, 2025 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants