Skip to content

add support doc for spamassassin module#837

Open
juliebin wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
spamssassin
Open

add support doc for spamassassin module#837
juliebin wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
spamssassin

Conversation

@juliebin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@juliebin juliebin commented May 14, 2026

  • Give your PR a recognizable title. For example: "FE-123: Add new prop to component" or "Resolve Issue Create new-pricing-increases-costs #123: Fix bug in component"
  • Your PR title will be visible in changelogs

What Changed

  • What changes does this PR propose?
  • Provide screenshots or screen recordings for any visual changes.

How To Test or Verify

  • Describe any steps that may help reviewers verify changes.
  • Anything beyond basic unit testing, such as assistive tech usage, or special interactions.

PR Checklist

Below are some checklists to follow for the correct procedure in different circumstance. The first list ("All PRs Checklist") should be followed for ALL PRs. The next 2 are additive to this list depending on what type of PR you are using.

For example: If you are submitting a content change to one of the support documents, your checklist would include the:

  • "All PRs Checklist"
  • AND the "Content Changes Checklist

If you are submitting a feature addition, enhancement, or bug fix, your checklist would include the:

  • "All PRs Checklist"
  • AND the "Development Changes Checklist"

All PRs Checklist

  • Give your pull request a meaningful name.
  • Use lowercase filenames.
  • Apply at least one team label according to which team is the content expert (ie. team-FE or team-SAZ)
  • Pull request approval from the FE team or content experts (see label applied above) that isn't the content creator.

Content Changes Checklist

  • Check that your article looks correct in the preview here or in a Netlify deploy preview.
  • Check the links in your article.
  • Check the images in your article (if there are any)
  • Check to make sure you are using markdown appropriately as outlined in examples/article.md in the root of the project directory and on the momentum doc's preface article
  • Check to make sure the Copy and Tone Guidelines are followed.

Development Changes Checklist (some checks are automatic github actions and will not be listed here. ie. "all tests pass")

  • The appropriate tests are created in cypress/ directory in the root of the project
  • The lighthouse score is passing according to the FE Support Docs' Service Outline SLI/SLOs

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only change that adds a new module page and links it into the module indexes; low risk aside from potential doc inaccuracies or broken links.

Overview
Adds a new spamassassin module reference page describing configuration (daemon, timeout, max_size), SPAMC/SPAMD protocol expectations, exposed spamc_* message context variables, and Lua/C entry points for invoking scans.

Updates the modules TOC (modules/index.md) and the full module summary table (summary-all-modules.md) to include the new spamassassin module entry and note it as a singleton introduced in 5.0 that replaces the legacy Sieve-based spamc module.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4df8359. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented May 14, 2026

Deploy Preview for support-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4df8359
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/support-docs/deploys/6a071e6fba78c7000819ffb5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-837--support-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@juliebin juliebin requested review from deepakpn and dkoerichbird May 15, 2026 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants