chore: Simplify redundantptr custom linter

[gmlewis]

This reduces the maintenance burden for the redundantptr linter by removing an unnecessary fake file with the current version number built into its path.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.75%. Comparing base (7d06267) to head (e410ff3).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4148      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.70%   93.75%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         210      211       +1     
  Lines       18996    19687     +691     
==========================================
+ Hits        17801    18458     +657     
- Misses       1009     1031      +22     
- Partials      186      198      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gmlewis]

cc: @stevehipwell - @alexandear - @zyfy29 - @Not-Dhananjay-Mishra - @munlicode

[munlicode]

LGTM,

Though I wonder, if comments should be left as they are?

_ = Ptr(name) // want `replace github.Ptr\(name\) with &name`

Is there a reason for leaving it this way?

[gmlewis]

LGTM,

Though I wonder, if comments should be left as they are?

_ = Ptr(name) // want `replace github.Ptr\(name\) with &name`

Is there a reason for leaving it this way?

Yes, because it only flags the Ptr function in a "github" package.

[gmlewis]

Thank you, @munlicode and @alexandear!
Merging.