Update types

[ewu63]

Purpose

Just some long-overdue type annotations

Expected time until merged

A few days

Type of change

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (non-backwards-compatible fix or feature)
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)
• Documentation update
• Maintenance update
• Other (please describe)

Testing

Checklist

• I have run ruff check and ruff format to make sure the Python code adheres to PEP-8 and is consistently formatted
• I have formatted the Fortran code with fprettify or C/C++ code with clang-format as applicable
• I have run unit and regression tests which pass locally with my changes
• I have added new tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.99%. Comparing base (92cd835) to head (c0b01bd).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #466   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.99%   82.99%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         147      147           
=======================================
  Hits          122      122           
  Misses         25       25           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[marcomangano]

The error on readthedocs must be a glitch (setuptools missing from the environment?) because the other PRs are not having the same issue.

The stable build is failing because that image is still using python<3.10, so there is a version conflict. Let me try real quick to move back the requirement to see if at least the RTD build passes

[ewu63]

Finally ready @marcomangano @A-CGray

[marcomangano]

I gave a quick pass and it is looking good. This is only tested locally, correct? Do we have any notes about that?

[marcomangano]

Should we use the numpy-specific array type here as well?

[A-CGray]

How do you want to handle this PR relative to #483 @ewu63? Merge that first then add typing for the Uno wrapper in this PR?