Skip to content

[FIX] fix neurosynth style question and create upload study question #38

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
jdkent wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[FIX] fix neurosynth style question and create upload study question #38

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 9 additions & 1 deletion docs/introduction/faq.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ It is on our roadmap to provide more robust collaboration features in the future

<details>
<summary>How do I run a legacy Neurosynth-like meta-analysis?</summary>
Use the <a href="../tutorial/automated">Automated Meta-Analysis tutorial</a> as the closest workflow. In brief: create a Project, use the Simple curation workflow, import studies from NeuroStore using your search term, promote the relevant studies to Included, move to Extraction, and then create a Meta-Analysis Specification. Using the search term is similar to the tf-idf approach used in the original Neurosynth platform since the threshold for inclusion was so low, if the word was mentioned in the abstract, it would be included.
Use the <a href="../tutorial/automated">Automated Meta-Analysis tutorial</a> as the closest workflow. In brief: create a Project, use the Simple curation workflow, import studies from NeuroStore using your search term, promote the relevant studies to Included, move to Extraction, and then create a Meta-Analysis Specification. Using the search term is similar to the tf-idf approach used in the original Neurosynth platform since the threshold for inclusion was so low (1 in 1000 words), if the word was mentioned in the abstract, it would be included,
as long as it isn't a common word in the english language. So, for example, if you wanted to run a meta-analysis on working memory, you could search for `working memory` in the NeuroStore database, and then include all studies that mention that term in the abstract.
<br/><br/>
For the algorithm, select `MKDAChi2`. This is the large-scale association-test workflow used by the original Neurosynth platform. When prompted for a reference dataset, choose `Neurosynth` if you want the legacy Neurosynth reference sample, or `Neurostore` if you want the newer continuously updated database.
</details>
Expand All @@ -64,3 +65,10 @@ Annotations are most often used to decide which Analyses should be included in a
<br/><br/>
See the <a href="../guide/glossary#annotation">Glossary entry on Annotations</a> and the <a href="../guide/Project/Extraction#annotations">Extraction guide</a> for more detail.
</details>


<details>
<summary>When I upload a new Study that's not in the database, are coordinates automatically extracted?</summary>
Coordinates are not automatically extracted when you upload a new Study. You will need to manually specify the coordinates for each Analysis in the Study.
This is on our roadmap to automate in the future.
</details>
Loading