Skip to content

ci: push cloudserver-dashboards artifact on every CI build#6148

Merged
bert-e merged 1 commit intodevelopment/9.3from
improvement/CLDSRV-889/publish-dashboards-on-ci
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

ci: push cloudserver-dashboards artifact on every CI build#6148
bert-e merged 1 commit intodevelopment/9.3from
improvement/CLDSRV-889/publish-dashboards-on-ci

Conversation

@delthas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@delthas delthas commented Apr 13, 2026

Summary

  • Add Install Oras and Push dashboards steps to the build job in tests.yaml, tagging the OCI artifact with github.sha so every CI commit publishes cloudserver-dashboards:<sha>.
  • Mirrors the existing push in release.yaml (which continues to publish the version-tagged artifact on tagged releases).
  • Analogous to Fix generating policies/dashboards images on non-tag CI builds backbeat#2697 — unblocks downstream deploys that pull dashboards by commit SHA.

Issue: CLDSRV-889

Today cloudserver-dashboards is published only from release.yaml on
tagged releases. CI commits build and push cloudserver images but skip
the dashboards artifact, which breaks downstream deploys that pull
dashboards by commit SHA (cf. scality/backbeat#2697).

Push the dashboards OCI artifact from the tests.yaml build job tagged
by github.sha, in addition to the existing release path.

Issue: CLDSRV-889
@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 13, 2026

Hello delthas,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 13, 2026

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@claude
Copy link
Copy Markdown

claude bot commented Apr 13, 2026

LGTM

Review by Claude Code

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2026

❌ 1 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
8290 1 8289 0
View the top 1 failed test(s) by shortest run time
"after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"::MPU with x-scal-s3-version-id header With default signature "after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"
Stack Traces | 0.002s run time
socket hang up

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.

@delthas delthas requested review from a team, DarkIsDude and francoisferrand April 13, 2026 15:35
@francoisferrand
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

unblocks downstream deploys that pull dashboards by commit SHA.

this is most often not required : if you bump into deps.yaml, indeed it will try to pull this; but if you patch the CI's zenkoversion instead you can update the service image specifically

@delthas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

delthas commented Apr 14, 2026

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 14, 2026

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 14, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-889.

Goodbye delthas.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit ef68e09 into development/9.3 Apr 14, 2026
56 of 57 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-889/publish-dashboards-on-ci branch April 14, 2026 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants