Skip to content

Add AI review customization workflows#905

Open
johnml1135 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
new_skills
Open

Add AI review customization workflows#905
johnml1135 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
new_skills

Conversation

@johnml1135
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnml1135 johnml1135 commented May 20, 2026

Summary

Adds FieldWorks AI customization workflows for PR review and author feedback:

  • Add review analyzer instructions for FieldWorks-specific PR analysis.
  • Add a challenge-pr-author skill and prompt for interactive pre-PR review summaries.
  • Add respond-to-review-comments customization artifacts and context updates.

CI-ready checklist

  • Commit messages follow .github/commit-guidelines.md.
  • No whitespace warnings locally; ran CI: Full local check after amending whitespace-normalized files.
  • Builds/tests pass locally (not run; changes are documentation/customization only).
  • For any Src/** folders touched, corresponding AGENTS.md files are updated or explicitly confirmed still accurate. No Src/** folders were touched.

Notes for reviewers

This PR changes Copilot customization and context files only; no product source, build scripts, installer files, or runtime behavior changed.


This change is Reviewable

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 20, 2026 23:47
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Adds FieldWorks-specific Copilot customization artifacts to standardize PR analysis, pre-PR author “challenge” workflows, and structured response handling for review comments.

Changes:

  • Added a repo-root CONTEXT.md glossary/invariants document to align terminology across humans and agents.
  • Introduced new skills/prompts for pre-PR author challenge (challenge-pr-author) and for addressing review feedback (respond-to-review-comments), plus a terminology-grilling skill (grill-with-docs).
  • Added a FieldWorks-specific review analyzer instruction set and updated repo context entry points.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
CONTEXT.md New repo-wide shared language/glossary and invariants for FieldWorks.
.github/skills/respond-to-review-comments/SKILL.md New workflow skill for triaging/fixing/replying to PR review comments.
.github/skills/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md New skill for tightening terminology against repo context documents.
.github/skills/challenge-pr-author/SKILL.md New pre-PR interactive author “challenge” workflow that writes .review/summary.md.
.github/prompts/respond-to-review-comments.prompt.md Prompt wiring to invoke the respond-to-review-comments skill.
.github/prompts/challenge-pr-author.prompt.md Prompt wiring to invoke the challenge-pr-author skill.
.github/instructions/review-analyzer.instructions.md New FieldWorks PR/branch analysis policy with required passes and rubric.
.github/context/codebase.context.md Adds pointers to CONTEXT.md and the new review-response skill.

Use these entry points to load context efficiently without scanning the entire repo.

- Shared language and glossary: `CONTEXT.md`
- Onboarding: `.github/AGENTS.md`

## Required Context

Before working comments:
name: challenge-pr-author
description: "Interactively challenge a FieldWorks PR author before posting a PR. Use for pre-PR review, author interview, branch review, PR readiness, review summary generation, and surfacing gaps in understanding or validation."
argument-hint: "Optional branch purpose or PR goal"
user-invocable: false

> "Review summary written to `.review/summary.md`.
>
> Please review it, make changes where appropriate, and run `/challenge-pr-author` again until you are ready to post the PR.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

NUnit Tests

    1 files  ±0      1 suites  ±0   10m 45s ⏱️ -23s
4 205 tests ±0  4 134 ✅ ±0  71 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
4 214 runs  ±0  4 143 ✅ ±0  71 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit ea0bf43. ± Comparison against base commit b0bf8a8.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants