Skip to content

NAS-140683 / 27.0.0-BETA.1 / Add support for ARM build#260

Merged
Qubad786 merged 1 commit into
truenas/linux-6.18from
NAS-140683
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

NAS-140683 / 27.0.0-BETA.1 / Add support for ARM build#260
Qubad786 merged 1 commit into
truenas/linux-6.18from
NAS-140683

Conversation

@Qubad786
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@Qubad786 Qubad786 self-assigned this Apr 24, 2026
@bugclerk bugclerk changed the title Add support for ARM build NAS-140683 / 27.0.0-BETA.1 / Add support for ARM build Apr 24, 2026
@bugclerk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Qubad786 Qubad786 requested review from ixhamza and yocalebo April 24, 2026 12:29
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ixhamza ixhamza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is the stock Debian configuration fetched from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux/linux-config-6.18_6.18.15-1~bpo13+1_arm64.deb, similar to what we already use for x86, it should be good as a first pass. That said, I think we'll need to later take a careful look at truenas.config, since it contains some x86-specific options. They should be no-ops on ARM, but still worth reviewing. There are also a few options (e.g. CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER) that apply to both arches but whose values were tuned with x86 in mind, so those may need rethinking for ARM as well.

@Qubad786 Qubad786 merged commit d42d4a2 into truenas/linux-6.18 Apr 24, 2026
6 checks passed
@Qubad786 Qubad786 deleted the NAS-140683 branch April 24, 2026 14:24
@bugclerk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has been merged and conversations have been locked.
If you would like to discuss more about this issue please use our forums or raise a Jira ticket.

@truenas truenas locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 24, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants