Open
Conversation
|
Thanks for opening a new PR! AI started to review it |
Comment on lines
+58
to
+62
| # Is a file? | ||
| if stat.S_ISREG(st.st_mode): | ||
| result_files.append(file_path) | ||
| # Is a directory? | ||
| if stat.S_ISDIR(st.st_mode): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comments '# Is a file?' and '# Is a directory?' are describing what the following if-statements are checking. Since the code is already using clear function names (stat.S_ISREG and stat.S_ISDIR) and variable names, these comments may not add much value. When code is self-explanatory, do you think it's necessary to add comments that just restate what the code does? How might you decide when a comment is truly helpful versus when it might be redundant?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.